This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sweden, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sweden-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SwedenWikipedia:WikiProject SwedenTemplate:WikiProject SwedenSweden articles
Latest comment: 17 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
article says: "It isn not certain that each division is a feeder of teams to the division that lie directly above it and relegates teams to the divisions that lie directly below it, even though this usually is the case." Then Div 3 Nordvästra Götaland really should be below Div 2 Västra G., and Divs 3 Mellersta Götaland should maybe be below the Div 2 with the same name. But that wouldn't be quite correct either. My suggestion is that the "even though this is usually the case" should be dropped. (and then we maybe still should swap the placement of Div 3 NV Göt, and Div 3 Mel Göt. Thoughts? /Kriko22:10, 17 March 2007 (UTC)Reply
I swaped places of a few of the leagues. I still believe that "even though this is usually the case" should be kept, as it usually is the case for the other leagues, and between other levels. – Elisson • T • C • 17:39, 14 April 2007 (UTC)Reply
