Talk:Swedish heraldry

Latest comment: 1 month ago by AirshipJungleman29 in topic GA Reassessment
Good articleSwedish heraldry has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
March 3, 2009Good article nomineeNot listed
July 17, 2009Good article nomineeListed
February 23, 2012Featured article candidateNot promoted
September 22, 2024Good article reassessmentKept
Current status: Good article
edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 7 external links on Swedish heraldry. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:56, 1 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

GA concerns

edit

I am concerned that this article no longer meets the good article criteria because of numerous uncited statements throughout the article. Is anyone interested in addressing this, or should this go to WP:GAR? Z1720 (talk) 03:17, 25 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

GA Reassessment

edit

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.


Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · WatchWatch article reassessment pageMost recent review
Result: No consensus. ~~ AirshipJungleman29 (talk) 21:16, 22 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

There are numerous uncited statements throughout the article. Z1720 (talk) 07:17, 9 September 2024 (UTC)Reply

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.