Talk:Swedish literature/GA1

GA Reassessment

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Starting GA reassessment as part of the GA Sweeps process. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:55, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

In order to uphold the quality of Wikipedia:Good articles, all articles listed as Good articles are being reviewed against the GA criteria as part of the GA project quality task force. While all the hard work that has gone into this article is appreciated, unfortunately, as of August 5, 2009, this article fails to satisfy the criteria, as detailed below. For that reason, the article has been delisted from WP:GA. However, if improvements are made bringing the article up to standards, the article may be nominated at WP:GAN. If you feel this decision has been made in error, you may seek remediation at WP:GAR.

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose):

   • The prose in clumsy in places and would benefit from a thorough copy-edit to improve clarity and readability. There are a few instances of weasel words. e.g. arguably; exceptional; cynical; - if these derive from sources they would be OK if directly attributed to the source author. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (MoS):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references):

   • I fixed two redirects using WP:CHECKLINKS. There are a large number of uncited statements, particularly in the latter part of the article. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

   b (citations to reliable sources):

   • Sources appear reliable. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)

   c (OR):

3. It is broad in its scope.

   a (major aspects):

   b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):

   b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   • On hold for seven days for copy-edit and referencing. Major contributors and projects are being notified. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:22, 28 July 2009 (UTC)
   • OK, nothing has been done about these issues and seven days have passed so delisting. Jezhotwells (talk) 08:18, 5 August 2009 (UTC)