| |||||||||||||
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 18, 2022. The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that one of the first researchers to propose dolphin-assisted therapy for humans later renounced it? |
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
2008
editHi. I think its an important topic, without information in the web. Im just trying to describe the swimming with dolphins activity. Its a process and I will be working on the page for some days, so please let me find the way to make it rigth. I really care the exposition of this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tostonuco (talk • contribs) 22:23, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- The topic itself isn't encyclopedic regardless of what you do to it. It has been copied to another wiki-project designed for things like this. Ironholds 22:29, 15 July 2008 (UTC)
- Saying that a topic isn't encyclopedic because it isn't encyclopedic doesn't tell the rest of us much. Can you be more specific? Secondly, what do you mean by the copying comment? --Kizor 21:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- The topic is encyclopedic as established with consensus in the AFD discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 22:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- True, I'm just asking for his take on this to get around the circular deletion justification. Its kind are a genuine problem on WP. --Kizor 08:51, 21 July 2008 (UTC)
- The topic is encyclopedic as established with consensus in the AFD discussion. -- Whpq (talk) 22:49, 20 July 2008 (UTC)
- Saying that a topic isn't encyclopedic because it isn't encyclopedic doesn't tell the rest of us much. Can you be more specific? Secondly, what do you mean by the copying comment? --Kizor 21:23, 20 July 2008 (UTC)