Talk:Swiss Bank Corporation/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Some things which should probably be addressed before I go on and pass the review:

• The lead section should be expanded. Articles of 30,000kB+ length usually sport two good paragraphs, and some even a third. This one hardly has two. You could probably go a bit more detail, if you need substance for the lead.
• Some of your book sources lack authors. I opened some of them through Google Books; maybe you could include the editor, instead? I won't hold you to it for this review, but the best option would be to replace your citation format and replace them with the citation templates provided by Wikipedia. Those templates allow for some standardization, and guide you on what information you need to provide.

The only thing that really bothers me is the lead, otherwise I'd be inclined to pass the article now.

Reviewer: JonCatalán^(Talk) 15:53, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

• The lead has been addressd.|► ϋrбanяeneωaℓ • TALK ◄| 14:11, 26 September 2010 (UTC)