This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
As of now the subject of this article does not pass notability. One source is supplied that is so vague that it cannot be verified. The other barely mentions switcha in passing (not even giving a recipe just the ingredients). Even if better recipes are found without at least two reliable sources discussing the subject in detail (history of it, where the name came from, etc.) then it should not have its own article. Or we could just mention switcha in the lemonade article (where it now mentioned), add a source there, and redirect to that article. SQGibbon (talk) 13:15, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
Oppose merge plenty of sources cover this subject. This is a new article so it will likely expand over time. Also, the lemonade article is a mess and should be cleaned up. Candleabracadabra (talk) 13:38, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
You added more sources but with one possible exception they still do not go toward establishing notability -- they are just recipes or just mention the drink in passing, i.e., trivial. The one source that does go into detail is pure fluff. The author wanted to find out what makes the drink different from lemonade or at least where the name came from but was unable to do either. Clearly not a reliable source for an in depth discussion on the nature and history of the drink therefore also does not go toward establishing notability. It was just a fluff blog post about travelling in the area.
Also, saying that it's a new article and "will likely expand over time" is not sufficient. Being the article's creator it is up to you to establish notability before uploading the article into mainspace. That's why you have a sandbox. Get the article up to Wikipedia standards before putting here and then there will be no discussions like this one. SQGibbon (talk) 15:03, 15 September 2013 (UTC)Reply
