Talk:Sybil Thorndike/GA1

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Tim riley in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Aza24 (talk · contribs) 01:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply


Happy to review this. Best – Aza24 (talk) 01:24, 8 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

General comments

edit

Finding no major issues, these comments are exclusively minor quibbles. Aza24 (talk) 00:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Early life
  • For non-Anglophone readers, I do wonder if specifying that Lincolnshire is in the UK, or at least, England, might be beneficial
  • As we say in the first line she was English and specify the country in the info-box I think it would be a work of supererogation to add England here, but I will do so if you feel strongly that we should. Tim riley talk 15:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Fine as it, I believe Aza24 (talk) 22:01, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Anything that "pianist's cramp" could be linked to? tendonitis?
  • I presume we don't know who Marriages are Made in Heaven is by.
1914–1919
  • Many of the characters in this section have WP articles, but this may be overlinking so I'll leave it at your discretion
  • Otherwise looks good
1920s
  • Looks good
1930s
  • Given that Six Men of Dorset doesn't have an article, it might be worth including the names of Miles Malleson and Harvey Brooks
Post-war and 1950s
  • The second paragraph has almost all the sentences beginning with "in"—this might be addressed to sound less robotic
Later years, 1960–1976
  • Does "theatrical retirement home' mean more than simply a retirement home in a play? An odd adjective imo
  • The reviews of the show were all frightful, as far as I can discover (and according to Croall), but not for the first or last time the reviews for the star were much better than for the show. Tim riley talk 15:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Miscellaneous

edit
  • Formatting of sources is excellent, though I should note that the script I have installed warns that "Forces War Records" is a "generally unreliable source"
  • You might consider a word or two in the section headings so they are not exclusively decades. Fine by me either way though
  • You aren't the first reviewer of one of my submissions to say such a thing. Perhaps I'm too literal minded to be good at writing interesting section headings. Suggestions would be gladly received. Tim riley talk 15:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • I wonder if including her performances in Medea and Candida might be fitting in the lead. It seems strange to only mention one specific play there, and I assume she's well known enough in these two to make sense. Aza24 (talk) 00:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • I don't think either of these would be right in the lead. You'd have to be older than me – and I'm a septuagenarian – to have seen Thorndike in her peak years, and if people know of her at all now it will, I'm sure, be Saint Joan that pops up in their minds in connexion with her. Tim riley talk 15:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Thank you for the points, above. Most helpful. Tim riley talk 15:10, 12 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Tim, your responses seem most sensible and I believe this article full-fills all the GA requirements. I see no issues with neutrality, stability, or illustrations. Passing now. Best – Aza24 (talk) 22:05, 13 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Aza24, many thanks for your review. It is greatly appreciated. Tim riley talk 09:41, 14 December 2022 (UTC)Reply