Talk:Sydney Secondary College

Fair use rationale for Image:Ssclogo 2.jpg

Image:Ssclogo 2.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:53, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

Vanity

This article appears to be a Vanity Page; it is biased and highly praises the subject matter. It appears to have been written by Administrators of the school, which is against Wikipedia Behavioural Guidelines. I suggest it be added to the VFD list. Agroking (talk) 05:43, 31 March 2011 (UTC)

Yes, the article needs improving. Yes, parts of it are a little promo-ey, but hardly excessive or even noteworthy enough to warrant any actual discussion here. It is definitely not a candidate for WP:AFD, as it's a notable subject and has the potential to be improved. I suggest that you look into WP:BEFORE. -danjel (talk to me) 05:50, 31 March 2011 (UTC)