Talk:Symplocarpus foetidus

“heralding spring”

Someone has a very dry sense of humor; odd when discussing wetlands flora. —12.72.68.134 09:38, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Range maps

Here are two range maps:

• Flora of North Amer, map--1:
• Main entry: S. foetidus
• Map--2, (for E. U.S.), "Plants Profiles:"

Submitted, Saturday, Jun 24, Michael,inHOT,YumaAZ--Mmcannis 22:09, 24 June 2006 (UTC)

Related

It's not "unrelated" to Western Skunk Cabbage.....it's in the same subfamily. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snakewriggle (talk • contribs) 04:14, 14 March 2013 (UTC)

B-Class criteria checklist

The following checklist is posted with the intent of determining whether this article meets the six B-Class criteria:

References

Is the article is suitably referenced, with inline citations? Does it have has reliable sources, and any important or controversial material which is likely to be challenged?

Scope

Does the article reasonably cover the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies? Does it contain a large proportion of the material necessary for an A-Class article, although some sections may need expansion, and some less important topics may be missing?

Layout and organization

Does the article has a defined structure? Is the content organized into groups of related material, including a lead section and all the sections that can reasonably be included in an article of its kind?

Well written

Is the article reasonably well-written? Does the prose contain no major grammatical errors and flows sensibly?

Supporting materials

Does the article contain supporting materials where appropriate? Illustrations? Diagrams? Infobox?

Understandable

Does the article present its content in an appropriately understandable way? Is it is written with as broad an audience in mind as possible? Does the article incorrectly assume unnecessary technical background OR are technical terms explained or avoided where possible.

Input anyone?

  Bfpage |leave a message  02:25, 28 January 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Symplocarpus foetidus. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20070209065221/http://www.nwf.org:80/nationalwildlife/article.cfm?issueID=112&articleID=1418 to http://www.nwf.org/nationalwildlife/article.cfm?issueID=112&articleID=1418

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 22:58, 11 February 2016 (UTC)

better photos of typical plants

The article needs better photos of typical plants at various stages of development. The two thumbs of File:Eastern_Skunk_Cabbage_along_brook_in_sprintime.jpg and File:Skunk_cabbage_and_marsh_marigolds.jpg are useful but those detailed photos are not usable without clicking/enlarging. The article itself needs a good gallery for browsing at a glance, showing typical views of a single plant at various stages of development.-71.174.176.65 (talk) 19:33, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

However, see WP:NOTGALLERY. Peter coxhead (talk) 19:50, 13 April 2016 (UTC)

Celsius to Fahrenheit

When I was looking at the article, I saw that it said "Eastern skunk cabbage is notable for its ability to generate temperatures of up to 15–35 °C (27–63 °F) above air temperature." I checked on Google and found out that 15 °C is actually equal to 59 °F and 35 °C is equal to 95 °F. I am unable to fix this myself, so if anyone could, I would be most grateful. Thanks in advance, TheWikiSearcher (talk) 23:27, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

 Not done The original is correct. The key is the word "above". Yes, a temperature of 15 °C is about 60 °F, but a temperature change of 15 °C is a temperature change of 9/5*15 = 27 °F. (The reason is that the difference between the boiling and freezing points of water is divided into 100 Celsius degrees and 180 Fahrenheit degrees, so a change of 5 Celsius degrees = a change of 9 Fahrenheit degrees. But they don't start at the same point: the Fahrenheit scale has its zero 32 of its degrees below the Celsius scale. So converting temperatures and converting temperature changes needs different formulae.) Peter coxhead (talk) 08:42, 26 September 2020 (UTC)

Common name

What are the origins of the common name skunk cabbage? Not "skunk", but "cabbage"? (Wild guess: it flowers on or about St. Patrick's Day, which is associated with corned beef and cabbage.) Tom Scavo (talk) 16:33, 24 March 2022 (UTC)

Wiki Education assignment: BIOL 343

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2022 and 9 December 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Lisa12138 (article contribs).

— Assignment last updated by Infocard (talk) 05:57, 9 December 2022 (UTC)

Taxon name

I removed the category Category:Taxa named by since Linnaeus did not name Symplocarpus foetidus. However, I'm not sure who gets credit in this case: Salisbury, Barton, or both? If you know the answer, please let me know. Thanks! Tom Scavo (talk) 17:44, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

@Peter coxhead: can you answer this question? TIA Tom Scavo (talk) 17:50, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

@Trscavo: the problem is that there's no clear advice that I can find on what "named by" means for ICNafp names. Linnaeus definitely did name Symplocarpus foetidus; he first published the epithet foetidus and this is forever associated with the species. If it were a name under the ICZN, that would be the end of it. But botanists also show who authored the combination, so it could be argued that the combination author(s) also "named" the taxon. "Ex" authorship is a complicating issue. My interpretation of "Salisb. ex W.P.C.Barton" is that the combination was suggested but not formally (validly) published by Salisbury and was first published by Barton, i.e. Salisbury suggested the combination but Barton actually made it. So who named it depends on what you mean by "named". The simplest approach would be to credit every person named in the authority. But it needs a wider discussion in my view. Peter coxhead (talk) 18:41, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

Thanks @Peter coxhead:. Let's see if someone else weighs in. Tom Scavo (talk) 19:27, 7 April 2023 (UTC)

On second thought, I'm gonna give Barton credit since he was the first to validly describe Symplocarpus foetidus. If someone thinks that Salisbury deserves credit as well, they can add a second category. Thanks! Tom Scavo (talk)