Talk:Synapturanus danta
Latest comment: 2 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
A fact from Synapturanus danta appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 6 June 2022 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
I've ran out of energy for this one, I think, so I'm gonna write up a lead and then submit it. I really wanted to work harder on it and I know there's a much better article somewhere in here, but start class is a start, no? casualdejekyll 19:45, 22 May 2022 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 10:25, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
( )
- ... that Synapturanus danta has been described as a "smooth lil fella"? Source: https://news.mongabay.com/2022/02/chocolate-frog-anyone-new-species-unearthed-in-amazon-peatlands/
- ALT1: ... that Synapturanus danta is a frog named after the Spanish word for tapir? Source: https://www.popsci.com/animals/tapir-frog-new-species/
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/Şevket Yorulmaz
- Comment: There is a minor WP:COPYWITHIN from text written by User:AryKun, which is attributed correctly AFAIK. First nom, let me know if anything here is wrong.
Moved to mainspace by Casualdejekyll (talk). Self-nominated at 00:32, 28 May 2022 (UTC).
- Hook checks out and is interesting; article is new enough at 4 days and long enough at 2400 characters. Appears to be policy compliant and based on a couple source checks is not a copyvio. QPQ done. Looks GTG here. Either hook is good and referenced.--Doug Coldwell (talk) 18:10, 30 May 2022 (UTC)