Talk:Synchronization of chaos

Reference

This article has a reference to "Chaotic Oscilattors" which links to "Chaos". I couldn't find any definition for "Chaotic Oscilattor" there.

192.114.175.2 (talk) 11:17, 20 December 2007 (UTC) I'm fairly certain that that's not how you spell "Oscilattor." I believe the proper term is oscilator, but I may be mistaken. You may want to consult an expert in the English Language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.181.114.192 (talk) 21:02, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Suggestion - embedded/evolved-adjustments to shaping functions of Plants

Although to most the mathematical-grunt/titanic-effort that new sciences of the maths of chaos goto, to with numerically/with-measurement confirmatory/proving attempts for theories about chaos, like with other sciences sometimes observational-science can also CONTINUE-to play a part, even after the more rigorous numerically/with-measurement confirmable processes have 'taken over'.

---

Therefore, entries / links to pages about plants USUAL compatibility-with-synchronization but also local-discordance (with-neighboring) of the shape and effects of their shapes,..

... compared to the LESS-usual, occurrence of plants that DO try/succeed to fit, or match, their growth into a mesh, or grid, often in simple situations such as light-absorption efficiency, but also in other contexts, damaging-wind reduction, water absorption, growth-barriers to fauna incursion, etc,..

... could have value / is relevant, at least as a easily observational example?

students/academics already invested in it need no such examples, but at least as a one-directional link?

There's no harm in linking those already interested in chaos-in-nature, to newer sciences adoption of the new fields.  :) 120.21.106.152 (talk) 14:17, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

so-say ... could be relevant to recent guesses that the clearing in Brazil, will additionally reduce the amount of trans-Atlantic dust that the Sahara whips up, since the "closeness" on the jungle, has been so severely damaged. That "closeness", could then be further identified as something with chaotic-ENCLOSURE aspects / traits, potentially including at least partially, genetic adjustment/evolutions-of. 120.21.106.152 (talk) 14:21, 30 June 2023 (UTC)

An easy CONTRAST, of things from nature, could then be summarized, too, with say, spider-webs that allow a lot of air to move through them, compared to 'tunnel' webs, that are of a design that is strong, rather than flexible / easily replaceable. One has structure, but no-closure, the other has chaotic-fitting, and enclosing, but no ORDERED-structure,.. etc 120.21.106.152 (talk) 14:23, 30 June 2023 (UTC)