Talk:Synonymous substitution

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Molecular Biology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Molecular Biology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Molecular BiologyWikipedia:WikiProject Molecular BiologyTemplate:WikiProject Molecular BiologyMolecular Biology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Genetics task force (assessed as Mid-importance).
	This article is supported by the Molecular and Cell Biology task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Evolutionary biology Mid‑importance

	Evolutionary biology portal This article is part of WikiProject Evolutionary biology, an attempt at building a useful set of articles on evolutionary biology and its associated subfields such as population genetics, quantitative genetics, molecular evolution, phylogenetics, and evolutionary developmental biology. It is distinct from the WikiProject Tree of Life in that it attempts to cover patterns, process and theory rather than systematics and taxonomy. If you would like to participate, there are some suggestions on this page (see also Wikipedia:Contributing FAQ for more information) or visit WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biologyWikipedia:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyTemplate:WikiProject Evolutionary biologyEvolutionary biology articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

This article should be updated. I'm glad it's here. But studies are now showing that synonymous mutations quite possibly be harmful, opposed to the assumption that they are neutral. Prof. Lawrence Hurst (University of Bath) has showed that some diseases owe their thanks to synonymous mutations. --jorgekluney.

Substitutions vs mutations

Latest comment: 13 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

This section is unsourced and certainly wrong. The term mutation is used to indicate any kind of change in the DNA sequence, including insertions and deletions and more broadly the effect of this changes (missense mutation, gain-of-function mutation). Substitution is the term for a single base-pair exchange [1]. Differences in sequence within populations are SNPs. Note that NCBI's SNP repository [2] contains also insertion and deletion polymorphisms, but use SNP to indicate true single nucleotide substitutions. I'll leave it as it is, in case there is a source for the original statement 24.255.35.103 (talk) 21:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

I don't think it is wrong. There might be a terminology conflict between sub-fields though. A possible source is the "Terminology and Style Conventions" of the author instructions for the journal Molecular Biology and Evolution: "A mutation generally occurs in a single individual and gives rise to an allele. If an allele achieves some frequency in a population it can be referred to as a polymorphism (not a "common [or rare] mutation"). If it has become fixed in a population it may be referred to as a substitution." I think this is the distinction the paragraph is talking about. Manbeargore (talk) 20:07, 6 February 2011 (UTC)Reply

Add topic