Talk:Synthesis anarchism
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Grnrchst in topic Sourcing concerns
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:37, 20 October 2018 (UTC)
Sourcing concerns
editThe article is significantly based on sources that fail to meet reliably sourced criteria. Graywalls (talk) 05:07, 18 October 2020 (UTC)
- @Graywalls: Hey, I've rewritten the article based on more reliable sources. Can you give it a look over and let me know what you think? Cheers. --Grnrchst (talk) 17:18, 21 December 2022 (UTC)
- Some sources, like those "submitted by..." on Libcom still don't live up to WP:RS. I didn't comb through each source just yet, but additional issue that is common with Libcom is copyright violation. Graywalls (talk) 16:30, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Ah right, you're talking about that list of federations at the end there? That's the one part of the article I didn't change. I can remove if you think it doesn't live up to RS. (Although I think the Freedom News article may count as RS? Not sure) -- Grnrchst (talk) 16:53, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Graywalls: On second thought, I went ahead and just removed the list. It kinda looked like an advertisement anyway. -- Grnrchst (talk) 21:14, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Some sources, like those "submitted by..." on Libcom still don't live up to WP:RS. I didn't comb through each source just yet, but additional issue that is common with Libcom is copyright violation. Graywalls (talk) 16:30, 22 December 2022 (UTC)