Talk:Szekely language
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Borsoka in topic Szekely language existance
 | This is the talk page of a redirect that targets the page: • Hungarian dialects Because this page is not frequently watched, present and future discussions, edit requests and requested moves should take place at: • Talk:Hungarian dialects |
 | This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||
| ||||||||
Szekely language existance
editexpand needed for this article. Magysze (talk) 12:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- For further discussion, see Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Languages#Szekely language –Austronesier (talk) 13:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- The article should be expanded. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magysze (talk • contribs) 16:29, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- As soon as you can refer to reliable sources to substantiate the existence of the "Szekely language", the article could be expanded. Until then, it is only a fringe theory. Borsoka (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- What you do is denying the existence of Szekely people and their language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magysze (talk • contribs) 16:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, until you do not refer to a reliable source describing the "Szekely language", I ignore your remarks about it. Borsoka (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Szekely language was/is the language spoken by Szekely people. Even if you don't like it or not. Magysze (talk) 16:40, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Scholars do not like your idea. Borsoka (talk) 16:47, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry, until you do not refer to a reliable source describing the "Szekely language", I ignore your remarks about it. Borsoka (talk) 16:38, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- What you do is denying the existence of Szekely people and their language. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Magysze (talk • contribs) 16:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Szekely people fight for their language. You oppress them. Like you did with other people see magyarisationMagysze (talk) 16:50, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Could you refer to reliable sources to verify your above statements? Borsoka (talk) 17:18, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Well, the article magyarisation is full of them, right? If you don't identify with Szekely of course it's hard for you understand. I see now. Magysze (talk) 17:20, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Any scholarly sources about the "Szekely language"? –Austronesier (talk) 17:23, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Lourdes: Magysze twice stated that he was Hungarian on two articles' Talk page ([1] and [2]). These were obviously false statements and he is obviously not here to build an encyclopedia ([3]). Where do you think I can report him? Borsoka (talk) 17:52, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- Since when ethnicity of editors is a reason for reporting?? Are you a harrasser? Magysze (talk) 17:53, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- An editor's ethnicity is not a reason for reporting. Borsoka (talk) 18:35, 6 February 2021 (UTC)
- As soon as you can refer to reliable sources to substantiate the existence of the "Szekely language", the article could be expanded. Until then, it is only a fringe theory. Borsoka (talk) 16:34, 6 February 2021 (UTC)