Talk:Tôn Đức Thắng
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tôn Đức Thắng article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This level-5 vital article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editIf possible, could anyone expand on the legacy of Ton Duc Thang. I tried to cover bits and pieces of it, and tried not to avert from a NPOV. --Nishkid64 15:07, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
- Can anyone get a picture of this man? I'm trying to get one from official sites of the Vietnam government. Maybe I will add it later but if you have good pic then please feel free to add it. Hawkie 19:14, 29 August 2006 (UTC)
Peer review of bio
editI am not familar with this person, but can give you some tips on getting article good rating.
- Insure article is in {{subst:Biography}} format
- Your pretty much there, just add "Biography" heading, and make current ones subs of it
- Add a "References" section and try and WP:CITE your sources. Even if it's a written book, you can still cite it as source
- Added external links section if you can to further reading
Hope this helps! Hackajar 16:10, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
- Thanks for the peer review. Before I wrote this article, I did not know who this person was at all. I just made it by reading through some encyclopedic articles. I did not use a written book at all, and I just cited the web pages I used. I'll try to find more if I can. --Nishkid64 21:31, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
No specific references
editThe article seems to be pretty good already, except for the lack of specific references. Was "Imagined Ancestries of Vietnamese Communism: Ton Duc Thang and the Politics of History and Memory" used in the creation of the article? If so, it should be listed under "references", not "further reading". The current references are very general, and don't specify which encyclopedias were used for specific claims in the article. I'd suggest using in-line references (either links or footnotes). Cherak 20:22, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
- I did not use the book at all. I had to basically use the encyclopedia sources. I guess I'll try to add in-line refs for the article (although I took most of the information from Brittanica). --Nishkid64 21:59, 19 September 2006 (UTC)
Assessment comment
editThe comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Tôn Đức Thắng/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.
Good links, good info, and an infobox. Mostly needs expansion to get to B-class. A picture would be helpful. Green caterpillar 19:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC) |
Last edited at 19:40, 5 September 2006 (UTC). Substituted at 09:26, 30 April 2016 (UTC)