Talk:T–V distinction in the world's languages
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | Text and/or other creative content from this version of T–V distinction was copied or moved into T–V distinction in the world's languages with this edit on 13 June 2019. The former page's history now serves to provide attribution for that content in the latter page, and it must not be deleted as long as the latter page exists. |
New page
editThis article has been created by splitting the "In specific languages" section from the T–V distinction article, following a discussion posted there. The content here, apart from the Introduction, is derived entirely from that article, and (for attribution purposes) that article's edit history should be consulted. Moonraker12 (talk) 23:24, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Length
editIt seems this article is still (at 140KB) far too long, so (following on from the discussion at Talk:T–V distinction#Article's length), I would suggest splitting off and summarizing some of the longer sections to stand-alone articles, with main article links at the relevant language page. The candidates that spring to mind are the Dutch, German, French, Hungarian, and Basque sections. Any thoughts? Moonraker12 (talk) 23:51, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
- I would generally refrain from giving each language their own page, unless there is enough information about it (such as the German section on this page). Instead of giving each language their own page, I'd focus on giving each major language family their own page. Germanic, Romance and Balto-Slavic are the big candidates; after those are given their own page it should be mostly fine (maybe).--Megaman en m (talk) 06:52, 14 June 2019 (UTC)