Wikipedia

Talk:T-72 operators and variants

Latest comment: 1 year ago by Finskii in topic T-72B3M obr.2016 Commander Panoramic Sight.
Learn more about this page

T-72 in Israel

edit
Latest comment: 16 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Unlike T-54/55/62, the T-72 was never adopted by the IDF. Moreover, as far as I know, Israeli forces didn't capture any T-72 in 1982. Apparently, the tank was only used in combat in the last days of the war and none remained in in the territory controlled by Israel. Apparently there was at least one attempt to recover a damaged tank, but it failed. The tank in Latrun is not a captured Syrian vehicle, it was bought somewhere in Eastern Europe in 1990s. Bukvoed (talk) 07:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Since there's no reference supporting this, I've removed Israel from the operators. —Michael Z. 2008-10-04 16:06 z

North Korea

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

How much T-72 the North Korean Army has? Why aren't they listed here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 90.190.195.86 (talk) 19:13, 15 April 2009 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned references in T-72 operators and variants

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

I check pages listed in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting to try to fix reference errors. One of the things I do is look for content for orphaned references in wikilinked articles. I have found content for some of T-72 operators and variants's orphans, the problem is that I found more than one version. I can't determine which (if any) is correct for this article, so I am asking for a sentient editor to look it over and copy the correct ref content into this article.

Reference named "militaryparitet":

Reference named "Janes":

I apologize if any of the above are effectively identical; I am just a simple computer program, so I can't determine whether minor differences are significant or not. AnomieBOT⚡ 08:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unconfirmed references

edit
Latest comment: 15 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
  • There is no trusted reference regarding capturing T72-SIM1 by Russian army, just unconfirmed and inadequate forum posts, even more - there are no loses like '44 tanks' as is said in here. Official source did not confirm this. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.139.155.198 (talk) 11:22, 10 August 2009 (UTC)Reply

handcranked turret

edit
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Can anyone confirm that the Polish made T-72M and also the Iraqi made Asad Babil tanks only has a handcranked turret ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.118.172.14 (talk) 14:56, 21 August 2011 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 4 external links on T-72 operators and variants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

T-72 Ural original configuration picture

edit
Latest comment: 7 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The picture presented to be the original configuration of the T-72 prototype (Ob'yekt 172M) rather shows a modernized version, with the infrared searchlight switched to the right of the armament (original emplacement was on the left) and rubber skirts on the sides instead of flipper type panels (or nothing at all in the case of the prototype.) As the T-72 article says : Early model T-72s did not feature side skirts; instead, the original base model featured gill or flipper-type armour panels on either side of the forward part of the hull. When the T-72A was introduced in 1979, it was the first model to feature the plastic side skirts covering the upper part of the suspension, with separate panels protecting the side of the fuel and stowage panniers.

 Y An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:29, 5 April 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit
Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 9 external links on T-72 operators and variants. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:54, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion

edit
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:

You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

edit
Latest comment: 2 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 18:07, 22 April 2022 (UTC)Reply

T-72B3M obr.2016 Commander Panoramic Sight.

edit
Latest comment: 1 year ago1 comment1 person in discussion

While some sources describe the T-72B3M as having a PK-Pan panoramic sight for the commander, it seems this was not included in the production of most vehicles. Photos of production T-72B3M's show that there is no new commander panoramic sight. Finskii (talk) 15:25, 14 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Add topic
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:T-72_operators_and_variants&oldid=1231012954"