Talk:T-box transcription factor T
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||
 | This article may be too technical for most readers to understand. (September 2010) |
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Brachyury. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110706210422/http://xlaevis.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/gene/showgene.do?method=display&geneId=478788 to http://xlaevis.cpsc.ucalgary.ca/gene/showgene.do?method=display&geneId=478788
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:20, 7 November 2016 (UTC)
moved out of unassessed on the genetics project
edit1/15/17 DennisPietras (talk) 03:26, 16 January 2017 (UTC)
not present in all bilaterians
edit07/17/19 I think that planarians do not have a known homolog for Brachyury despite being well studied. Perhaps the language should be changed to "most" or something similar. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 146.244.235.83 (talk) 22:19, 17 July 2019 (UTC)
Clarification(?)
edit@Smith609: Ten years ago you asked for a clarification of a rather incomplete sentence. That sentence was cut short in this edit. I now tried to make it a bit clearer by restoring a bit of the origin. Is this sufficient for removing your {{cn}}, in your opinion? JoergenB (talk) 18:48, 4 March 2020 (UTC)