Talk:T-groups
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
| |||||||||||
 | The contents of the T-group (social psychology) page were merged into T-groups on 2011-10-27. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
| The contents of the Encounter group page were merged into T-groups on 2011-10-27. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Comments about excessive activities
editI'm confused (and troubled) by the comment on the current T-groups page that "a lot of the sensitivity training taking place uses excessive activities." I don't understand what that means. I'm a T-group facilitator at Stanford's Graduate School of Business, and I've participated in 7 T-groups over the past 9 years and have never had any experiences that I'd categorize this way. Because the comment is so unclear and seems inaccurate, in my experience, I'd like to remove it. However, my hunch is that the author has some concerns about T-groups that should certainly be addressed, so my preference would be to see the comment revised and expanded, rather than simply deleted. Edbatista (talk) 07:36, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
- A section called "arguments against" or something modeled on other controversial topics could be appropriate here to hold these comments. If you have other facts based on your experience, they should also have sections. Nirion (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
Merging this article
edit- The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.
- Merge done. -- P 1 9 9 • TALK 16:14, 27 October 2011 (UTC)
The suggestion that this article is merged with T-group_(social_psychology) seems sound, since they both are about the same thing. I don't know how to do that, but I agree that this should be done now. Nirion (talk) 10:27, 9 February 2011 (UTC)
advertising in the article
editThe section beginning with "A current T-group version that addresses the issue of openness is the "Tough Stuff" workshop of Robert P. Crosby and his associates...", and ending with the web address of the commercial website for the Crosby's consulting business, appears to be a promotional piece for their services. 174.24.226.141 (talk) 15:15, 18 December 2015 (UTC)
- Exactly my reaction on first read of this article. Crosby is not merely mentioned here--which would be appropriate--he is promoted, which is not. --50.68.134.51 (talk) 17:54, 28 June 2017 (UTC)