24.23.165.236 (talk) 01:11, 17 October 2011 (UTC)Mike "The proprietary production process starts with 3 tons of plant material per batch and ends up with capsules containing 5mg of TA-65.[3] " Kinda pointless unless you say how many capsules are produced. Recommend deletion.
- Yeah, well, the original source doesn't specify. Sorry. DS (talk) 13:25, 15 November 2011 (UTC)
Erectile dysfunction
editHas anyone else experienced any positive affects (slight) in this area when supplementing with TA65? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Peter Eaves (talk • contribs) 07:50, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Consider asking at a life-extension forum. 68.151.108.107 (talk) 04:15, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Materials
editThis is an excellent summary of TA-65 promotional materials. The "extensive testing" lines and inline external link show that an interested party has visited. This is an important field of study -- reccomended for integration into an Astragalus article and deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.151.108.107 (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)
Cancer Risk
editLots of anecdotal evidence on this subject, but the science is still murky. Some assert there is a risk of cancer. Article needs to address this.
http://www.nature.com/news/lawsuit-challenges-anti-ageing-claims-1.11090
Also unclear what chemical compound we are talking about here. TA-65 is a brand name. Is this just a herbal form of Cyclo-astragenol or is it something else?