Talk:TEMPI syndrome

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

note

Latest comment: 12 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion

This article is WP:COPYPASTEed but, I can't find from where. Planetary ChaosTalk 18:51, 28 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

I believe you think this is a copy/paste from the article in NEJM. This is an original synopsis.

Below you will find the e-mail from NEJM confirming that there is no copyright violation.

Can you please remove the tag? Thank you.

Original Message----- From: Permissions [1] Sent: Friday, January 13, 2012 8:48 PM

Subject: RE: Tempi syndrome - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I have viewed the two attachments that you sent. The Wikipedia piece does not seem to reflect an actual extraction of the NEJM text. Rather, it seems to be more of a synopsis of the piece. Therefore, I do not feel that any copyright permission would be needed from the NEJM.

Thank you.

Sincerely,

Readded {{Cv-unsure|date=April 2012}} tag. Content disputed as contact info seems to have been Copy and pasted from unknown source. Thus, it would seem the whole article may have been copy and pasted as well. Not saying it was copied from NEJM but perhapes maybe from another source. In anycase, permissions need to be handled by Wikipedia. A copy and pasted "e-mail" is not enough to allow copyright permission. Planetary ChaosTalk 22:48, 21 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Can you advise me how to prove it is an original work? I am trying to correct this claim on behalf of the authors of both the NEJM article and this wikipedia page. I would like to refer to you that the authors of this page are Schroyens and Sykesbd, and they are respectively the authors of the NEJM article Wilfried Schroyens and David B. Sykes.

As this is a novel disease with only limited discussion in literature, I find the unfounded claim that it is copy pasted from a different source to be quite premature and unsubstantiated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 83.101.30.63 (talk) 21:18, 15 June 2012 (UTC)Reply

Would a confirmatory e-mail from the author Wilfried Schroyens to permissions-en@wikimedia.org be satisfactory?

Add topic