Talk:TR-1700-class submarine

Latest comment: 6 years ago by 190.45.225.6 in topic Submarines are boats, not ships

Most adequate name for this article?

edit

As this submarine class is known in the Argentine Navy (its only user) as the Santa Cruz class, wouldn't be it more appropriate to rename this article accordingly? TR-1700 is the name of the design, not of the class itself. Also Santa Cruz is how the class is referred to in some books I've seen (I need to provide exact references for this, don't have them handy now).
Thanks & regards, DPdH (talk) 02:53, 7 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Articles about the ships of this class

edit

Hi all, I've added the wikilinks to the "future" articles about the ships ("boats" for the US?) of this class:

I'm currently working on them, and expect to have a first version in a couple of weeks.
Kind regards, DPdH (talk) 05:59, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

ARA Santa Fe completion

edit

Does anyone have more information/sources regarding this work aside from the link that was posted in the main article? I have brought this up as I could not find any more sources that talk about this possible completion work. Esw01407 (talk) 18:08, 12 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

after little googling, I only found a Congress Dic.2004 request [1] for the job be done --Jor70 (talk) 17:52, 23 February 2010 (UTC)Reply

Submarines are boats, not ships

edit

Submarines are normally classified as boats, not ships. The Development section correctly references 'boats', but the opening paragraph should be changed from 'ships' to 'boats' unless there is a specific rule in the Argentine military favoring the use of 'ship' for a submarine. 190.45.225.6 (talk) 21:16, 17 November 2018 (UTC)Reply