This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editI just wanted to point out that this article is wonderfully readable. In only pray it stays that way and doesn't get defaced by the science police. You know, the folks who think Wikipedia should be a graduate-level textbook rather than an encyclopedia, and troll around turning English descriptions of concepts into unreadable tensor calculus and/or jargon. Anyway, great article, even if it needs a little smoothing out. Xezlec (talk) 04:34, 15 December 2007 (UTC)