![]() | This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. |
TSCRIPT Theres also another TSCRIPT https://github.com/TGlas/tscript — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2A05:3E00:1:5B:7D9B:D6E8:E9DF:A49E (talk) 13:52, 11 December 2019 (UTC)
Dear Daryl Mitchell (User:DRM310),
This is the second time you have seen fit to label criticisms at this page, therefore I will answer your issues in more details. Additionally this response has been drafted together with the response to your criticism of its sister page and expect that you have read the primary response first, as I have not draft this response in isolation.
Obviously this page has been written as a brief introduction and explanation of an embedded scripting language that has been created to support scripted database access for its sister, and again has been written to allow a student in the field of Scripting Languages to identify all the known concepts contained within that field of research.
Again I would like to point out that your criticisms of this page and not every other page in the categories Scripting languages and Educational programming languages, indicates a bias on your behalf. Many of these scripting languages have been written by academic institutions and as "me to" products offer no new or novel concepts or ideas, yet you have not directed your criticism towards them.
Again you raise the issue of "close connection" and again we answer it with the fact that we are the ones best placed to be an authority on the subject. Once again I dispute your claim that Wikipedia is an academic only forum, pointing out that one of the initial design goals of Wikipedia is "that anyone can edit". And also I would like to point out that many of the pages written within the above mentioned categories have been written by someone who has a close personal interest in the subject matter.
Additionally we also point out that the subject matter of the article is focused on factual information about what new and novel features that it offers to the world’s body of knowledge. It has not engaged on comparisons with other products nor tries to indicate superiority to any other scripting language.
The second issues you have raised is that of "notability" and again we would point out that notability is not a market definition and it is our opinion that this page is note worthy because of the new and novel concepts and ideas that it represents to the field of computer scripting languages. For example the concept of run-time linking is an idea that I have never come across before and therefore adds to the global body of knowledge.
And finally you point out that many of the references are to primary sources, but randomly picking a similar article, such as BYOB for example and you see that the majority of articles within the categories reference primary material when describing the key functionality of the product. The evolving nature of technology means that many concepts will be deprecated before any critical mass will evolve.
Your singling out of this page rather than every other page in the category is unjust and honestly substantiates a bias on your behalf.