Talk:Tabloid Junkie/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: –– Jezhotwells (talk) 23:37, 3 April 2010 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for criteria)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS):

   I made a number of copy-edits[1] to correct elementary grammatical mistakes, spelling, readability and style. Please consider enlisting help for copy-editing before nominating articles at WP:GAN.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   All online sources are live., properly formatted, substantiate the statements and appear to be reliable sources.

1. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Sufficeint coverage of the subject and focussed on it.

2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

3. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   No images used

5. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   OK, this ticks all the boxes, so I am happy to pass this as a Good Article. Congratulations. But remember to get articles copy-edited before submitting them. –– Jezhotwells (talk) 00:11, 4 April 2010 (UTC)