Talk:Tadpole Computer

Notability

I concur with the unsigned request to remove this item for notability. It's also a stub, and if a spammer doesn't have the industry to be complete when spamming, well, that tells you the value of this entry. Dhvrm (talk) 16:05, 9 May 2008 (UTC)

I'm not quite as sure. Tadpole occupies a unique niche. This article, however, is little more than a stub. Ferritecore (talk) 15:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

• http://news.com.com/2100-1005-991803.html
• http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-24412444.htm
• http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-9114394.htm
• http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-23300250.html
• http://www.businessweekly.co.uk/2008081332342/computing/shareholders-fume-at-twist-in-tadpole-tail.html
• http://news.thomasnet.com/fullstory/819775
• http://www.accessmylibrary.com/premium/0286/0286-19383131.html
• http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Desktops-and-Notebooks/Suns-Mobile-Workstation-Offers-SPARC-Solaris/
• http://www.mywire.com/pubs/eWeek/2003/07/21/438059?extID=10051*
• http://news.zdnet.com/2100-9593-5546033-3.html
• http://www.washingtontechnology.com/online/1_1/25962-1.html
• http://www.computerweekly.com/Articles/2004/01/20/199691/linuxworld-expo-open-source-prepares-for-the-next-offensive.htm

Tadpole is notable as evidenced by the press coverage Tadpole gets. If five seconds of searching on Google gets this many links, one has to wonder if the editor who tagged this article actually bothered to do even basic research before tagging. The article certainly needs work though, for it is too short. I am removing the tag. Rilak (talk) 14:42, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

Some more links just in case:

• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-143775180.html
• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-138012366.html
• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-152515000.html
• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-16005317.html
• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-16980757.html
• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-18902287.html
• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-136387558.html
• http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-19917926.html

Enjoy! Rilak (talk) 14:56, 2 September 2008 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Tadpole Computer. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20050402100803/http://www.islandnet.com:80/~kpolsson/workstat/work1991.htm to http://www.islandnet.com/~KPOLSSON/workstat/work1991.htm

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 04:29, 21 March 2016 (UTC)

First 64bit laptop?

I havent yet done research, but I know DEC had the first commercially produced 64bit CPU with the Alpha, much before Intel. Perhaps the Alphabook1 might therefore ne the first 64bit laptop. Maybe this is already in an alreadt cited source? 2600:100E:A020:8641:5403:6C61:CD88:F868 (talk) 17:59, 21 February 2024 (UTC)