This article is within the scope of WikiProject Typography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to Typography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TypographyWikipedia:WikiProject TypographyTemplate:WikiProject TypographyTypography articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
Latest comment: 13 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
There are a couple of errors in the current article:
Nuo tai is still in use outside Taiwan, e.g., in Hong Kong. It might be a bit old fashioned, but it is still in use.
Ping tai is very much still in current use in letters and is not old fashioned at all. There are two places in letters that really are ping tai if you think about it:
The line break within the closing blessing in informal letters
The line break within the address to recipient in formal letters
"San tai (Chinese: 三抬, literally "triple shift") as above, but three characters above a normal line; since Chinese writers customarily leave a margin of two characters for tai tou from the paper border, a san tai would require the first character to appear outside of the page borders" :: this seems to mean, if taken literally, that the first character would be in the air off the left edge of the paper!!! If "above" is literal, the raised characters would overlap the previous line of text above. Or what is intended?
The examples shown in zh:抬頭 seem to show that "san tai" respect of 天 ("heaven") is written with "crlf space space" before the character.
Or does it mean that the lines of characters were written as columns, not rows? If so, then the idea of moving the start of the line 1/2/3 characters up, makes more sense. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 04:23, 1 October 2019 (UTC)Reply