Talk:Tails Adventure/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MWright96 (talk · contribs) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

Shall review this article. MWright96 (talk) 10:05, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

6. It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

Development and release

• The North American release date need to have its citation needed tag addressed in the prose and the infobox

Reception

• " Mean Machines Sega agreed, calling it "decidedly unoriginal" and," - From my perspective, it appears that there is something missing from this section of text. If so, please rectify it
• "1UP.com called Tails Adventures and Tails Skypatrol" - Adventure

References

• Perhaps you could consider archiving References 3 and 13 like you have done with the other online sources

Overall, a beautifully written article. Only a few minor nit picks prevent an automatic promotion to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 18:08, 4 January 2019 (UTC)

@MWright96: Thank you. I fixed all items. TarkusAB^talk 12:28, 5 January 2019 (UTC)

• @TarkusAB: Now promoting to GA class. MWright96 (talk) 13:12, 5 January 2019 (UTC)