Talk:Taiwan Miracle
 | This article was nominated for deletion on 5 August 2019. The result of the discussion was keep. |
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Taiwan Miracle article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
 | This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
 | It is requested that a template-based chart or charts be included in this article to improve its quality. Useful templates may be found in Category:Chart, diagram and graph formatting and function templates. Specific illustrations, plots or diagrams can be requested at the Graphic Lab. For more information, refer to discussion on this page and/or the listing at Wikipedia:Requested images. |
Make more sections
editThis article should be divede in more sections. Yug (talk) 20:52, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
Bias?
editI don't claim the slightest shred of expertise in this area, but the article does sound like it was edited by an overenthusiastic KMT supporter... --chainedwind
Krugman citation
editThere is a statement claiming that Krugman attributes the GDP growth in Taiwan to increase in capital and labor market, rather than increase in efficiency. The citation for this statement is an article by Krugman called "Myth of the Asian Miracle" or something to that effect. However, if you read into the article, there is no mention of Taiwan. The article does talk about Singapore, China, Japan, and East Asia in general terms, but how can such a general article be used to support very particular claim about Taiwan allegedly by Krugman? I suggest removing this citation. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 134.174.140.104 (talk) 17:32, 3 September 2009 (UTC)
This article is a political pamphlet
edit"But the state was the central organism which coordinated the industrialization process, it created the infrastructures, it attracted foreign investment, it decided the strategic priorities and, when necessary, recurred[clarification needed] to impose its conditions."
This sentence, in special, is laughable. The tone of this article is completely political and anti-encyclopedic.
2804:14C:CC92:AEAE:7D02:22AC:13A8:CB04 (talk) 14:12, 15 November 2021 (UTC)