Talk:Tajbeg Palace
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality. Wikipedians in Afghanistan may be able to help! |
Copyright violation
editI've removed most of the inf. included into the article by this edit. It seems, that website, it was taken from is copyrighted. Therefore, one can't copy and paste inf. from it here. Cmapm 03:10, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
- If you look closely, the article itself repeat itself in several mirrors websites at least 20 or 50 times. The Copyright itself is not of that webpage.
- Also, there is almost no information regarding the palace itself, and the history that was writed in this article is common knowledge found on other websites.
- By this, there is no copyright violation on the article. Messhermit 23:50, 28 November 2005 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tajbeg Palace. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091221075848/http://everywheremag.com/places/4482 to http://www.everywheremag.com/places/4482
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:24, 16 January 2018 (UTC)