Talk:Takashi Murakami

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 10 January 2022 and 30 April 2022. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): JustiinJohnson, C0URTwals, Cmp28600 (article contribs).

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 6 September 2020 and 7 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): DetongChe.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 10:40, 17 January 2022 (UTC)

Untitled

Ew, did he really make those mangas? 68.95.141.158 03:58, 16 March 2006 (UTC)

Not to make a fuss, but this article reads more like a magazine article about Murakami than an encyclopedia article. It also is way too fawning, but that seems to me a lesser concern. For example, the grand pronouncements about trends in art history ("Social commentary is nothing new"), rhetorical questioning ("So what makes Takashi Murakami different from his predecessors, like Andy Warhol?"), and interpretation of his work ("clearly critiques on westernization".) Even the descriptions of his paintings sound more suited to a breezy newspaper review than a straight-up description of his work ("the Superflat style is really obvious here"). The timeline is copied part-and-parcel from his company's website, which, however one credits it, seems like a pretty clear no-no. A top-to-bottom rewrite is probably in order, and I'm sure as hell not going to do it. 69.136.86.237 22:09, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes, I wonder if someone could explain what it is that makes "Hiropon" and "My Lonesome Cowboy" critiques of westernization. If anything, they seem almost transhumanist in depicting novel transformations of the human body; although art from its very beginnings has depicted bizarre, grotesque, and amazing modifications of human biology beyond its natural range. Mporter 03:32, 7 November 2006 (UTC)

This article is awful. Unencyclopedic, problems with tense agreement, praising tone, unnecessary information. Is the average reader going to care about Murakami's "hundreds of pocket sketchbooks" or that he uses Adobe Illustrator? And with the odd noun usage and marketing language, some of the sentences look like they've been lifted directly from a company brochure (i.e. "Kaikai Kiki is not only involved with how can we best make a piece of art with high quality and concept, but with a system of checks and balances, supply and demand."). 69.142.79.134 01:00, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

I'm working on a draft "top-to-bottom rewrite" of this page using published, scholarly sources. I hope to copy it across/fix this page up by the end of June 2007. I would appreciate your opinions at that time... Platinumbuddha 07:36, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

The Register Of The Tagged Section Isn't Very Encyclopedic.

Somepeople say style, but it's the linguistic definition I'm using.100110100 10:20, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Pardon me. I've noticed that I tagged just one section before; I've come across another sentence that could be changed. I'm not going to read the whole article, so I've tagged the whole article.100110100 10:25, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Uh...the picture on the top of the page...

It seems a little innapropriate...I mean, that's a...

its an example of his work. i think it fits. Evaunit666 01:39, 1 February 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Murakami(Army of Mushrooms).jpg

Image:Murakami(Army of Mushrooms).jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 03:11, 7 November 2007 (UTC)

Poku?

Isn't the "pop" in poku likely rather derived from pop art, than pop music? 惑乱 Wakuran (talk) 13:16, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

Hiropon

Having finally discovered what hiropon means (it's the Japanese pronunciation of Philopon, a brand name for a certain type of methamphetamines popular in early post-war Japan), I am curious if anyone has any sources on why Murakami named his "Hiropon Factory" and several works after it. I've never seen any explanation or discussion of the subject... and if we can find some, it'd be great to include in the article. LordAmeth (talk) 19:01, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Does he run http://www.anime.marumegane.com?

At Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Anime and manga#Japanese Source Check, we're trying to figure out if the page, as it claims, is run by Takashi Murakami. Can anyone here confirm that? -- Goodraise (talk) 18:42, 19 March 2009 (UTC)

Context

Hiroki Azuma "...On the other hand, although he is not at the center of our conversation today, there is a man who is famous for using the word “otaku” in the United States: Takashi Murakami. I have been interviewed a few times about him…

DM: Takashi Murakami, the painter and installation artist who had a big exhibition here earlier.
HA: Yes- Takashi Murakami is highly successful in the U.S., and he has used “otaku” as a key word. I have been interviewed a few times by the foreign press, and I’ve always told them: I want people to know that the Japanese otaku think Murakami’s introduction of “otaku” is wrong. Murakami does this on purpose. He doesn’t do this merely for the sake of his own success overseas. He has his own criticisms of the current state of otaku culture, and his own suggestions for its improvement. In this way, his strategic use of the word “otaku” is intricately related to the domestic condition of otaku themselves.
...Dai Satō: To continue on with the story about Mr. Murakami, his works are sold for $6-700,000 (60 million to 70 million yen). Yet there are a great number of model sculptors in Japan who make similar figures. They sell their work for $20 to $30 (2000 yen to 3000 yen), but by simply injecting the word “art,” Murakami can charge much more. It is easy for us (otaku in Japan) to think that Mr. Murakami simply changes everything with the word “otaku.”

http://www.japansociety.org/otaku_unmasked --Gwern (contribs) 05:10 21 January 2012 (GMT)

File:Oval Budda in Versailles.jpg Nominated for Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Oval Budda in Versailles.jpg, has been nominated for deletion at Wikimedia Commons in the following category: Deletion requests March 2012 What should I do? Don't panic; a discussion will now take place over on Commons about whether to remove the file. This gives you an opportunity to contest the deletion, although please review Commons guidelines before doing so. If the image is non-free then you may need to upload it to Wikipedia (Commons does not allow fair use) If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale then it cannot be uploaded or used. To take part in any discussion, or to review a more detailed deletion rationale please visit the relevant image page (File:Oval Budda in Versailles.jpg) This is Bot placed notification, another user has nominated/tagged the image --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 00:46, 8 March 2012 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Takashi Murakami. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160415200146/http://mememe.gaga.ne.jp/ to http://mememe.gaga.ne.jp/
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120131124232/http://www.qma.org.qa/index.php/en/news/news-archive/342-qatar-museums-authority-to-present-murakami-%E2%80%93-ego-a-new-exhibition-by-japanese-artist-takashi-murakami to http://www.qma.org.qa/index.php/en/news/news-archive/342-qatar-museums-authority-to-present-murakami-%E2%80%93-ego-a-new-exhibition-by-japanese-artist-takashi-murakami

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 24 December 2017 (UTC)

Our article says this, but "This piece is Murakami's most expensive piece to date selling for $13,500,000 at Sotheby’s New York auction in 2008" however I have a source that says something sold for $15.1 million. A sculpture called "My Lonesome Cowboy" created in 1998, sold at auction for $15.1 million dollars. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Cmp28600 (talk • contribs) 06:02, 19 February 2022 (UTC)

--Jaymurphy25 (talk) 15:18, 12 April 2022 (UTC)

I think for the NFT section, there should be information on his bankruptcy within the pandemic that caused him to try to rush into the NFT world. This section could also include the style of his NFTs and that they are not his original flowers but rather cherry blossoms. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaymurphy25 (talk • contribs) 15:01, 12 April 2022 (UTC)