Talk:Tales of the Beanworld
Latest comment: 7 years ago by Centerone in topic Multiple issues?
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||
|
Untitled
editJust a heads up. I'm trading email with Larry Marder (and also Mark "Half" Irons, keeper of BeanWeb) about expanding this article. Should have a bunch of good stuff to put up real soon. Frankie 17:03, 11 August 2006 (UTC)
p.s. Larry says he plans to publish more Beanworld in 2007.
- sounds good! I think everyone had assumed Beanworld had died, despite his assurances that he would continue to write it forever... --duncan 07:25, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
- Hoka hoka hay. --Salix alba (talk) 10:39, 12 August 2006 (UTC)
Multiple issues?
editWhat are the 'multiple issues' that this article has? Can we get around to fixing them? Centerone (talk) 15:53, 26 February 2017 (UTC)
- The really big issue at the moment is references. There is only one but nothing which really justifies notability. Currently the article could be probably be speedy deleted.
- A quick search for suitable cites gives the
- New York Journal of Books http://www.nyjournalofbooks.com/book-review/tales-beanworld-volume-35-hc
- http://forbiddenplanet.blog/2009/propagandas-least-objective-review-ever-beanworlds-back/
- these only just about meet RS standards. --Salix alba (talk): 09:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)
- Thanks, Certainly it could stand additional citations. I meant more along the lines of the cleanup, and what other issues there may be. I believe there are certainly a number of other citations. Check scholar and books. Tales of the Beanworld was surprisingly well received and respected for what it was (and is.) I'm not terribly good at wikipedia citations however. Centerone (talk) 05:21, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
- these only just about meet RS standards. --Salix alba (talk): 09:22, 27 February 2017 (UTC)