Talk:Talnotrie Hoard
Latest comment: 3 years ago by Theleekycauldron in topic Did you know nomination
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
A fact from Talnotrie Hoard appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 18 October 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Theleekycauldron (talk) 05:39, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the 9th-century Talnotrie Hoard contained coins, jewellery, agate and beeswax, and was likely deposited by Vikings? Source: Maxwell, Herbert. "Notes on a Hoard of Personal Ornaments, Implements, and Anglo-Saxon and Northumbrian Coins from Talnotrie, Kirkcudbrightshire." Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Vol. 47. 1913. (https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-352-1/dissemination/pdf/vol_047/47_012_016.pdf)
- ALT1:... that a hoard of Viking treasure was found in 1912 when it fell out of peat fuel being placed on a fire? Source: Maxwell, Herbert. "Notes on a Hoard of Personal Ornaments, Implements, and Anglo-Saxon and Northumbrian Coins from Talnotrie, Kirkcudbrightshire." Proceedings of the Society of Antiquaries of Scotland. Vol. 47. 1913. (https://archaeologydataservice.ac.uk/archiveDS/archiveDownload?t=arch-352-1/dissemination/pdf/vol_047/47_012_016.pdf)
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/May Childs Nerney
- Comment: I'm not set on the image being included, but I have added it as an option, for the reviewers and promoters to decide!
Created by Lajmmoore (talk). Self-nominated at 09:05, 27 September 2021 (UTC).
- New (created 20 September); long enough (2672 words); within policy with inline cites. Earwig reports 3.8%, so copyright looks fine. Both hooks mostly look fine, but need some corrections: in the original, "is likely it was" -> "was likely"; and in ALT1 "fell out of fuel" should be clarified ('fell out of peat fuel' would be fine). Image looks OK but isn't great: up to the promoter to decide, if they don't have a better one that day! So @Lajmmoore: if you could tweak the hooks, I think this is ready to go. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 17:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks very much Mike Peel - I've made those changes to both now. Lajmmoore (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks for making the changes! Good to go now. Thanks. Mike Peel (talk) 10:27, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thanks very much Mike Peel - I've made those changes to both now. Lajmmoore (talk) 07:05, 7 October 2021 (UTC)