Talk:Tamwar Masood
This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Gay?
editI couldnt decide what to do about adding the rumour about him being gay, so I just went ahead and put it in, but ive said it's yet to be confirmed. If anyone thinks we should wait til it is confirmed, then feel free to remove.Gungadin♦ 18:31, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- From an OOU perspective I would say to leave it in. I love what you've done with the OOU stuff on newer characters by the way! — AnemoneProjectors (会話) 20:09, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks, it's actually quite simple doing OOU stuff for new characters, because there's more sources. I'd always assumed it would be harder because there's no storylines to discuss.Gungadin♦ 21:26, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
Merge maybe?
editTamwar isn't really a notable character in this and is quit minor. Maybe there should be a page for minor characters on a regular basis that characters like Tamwar can fit into until they have more notable stories and a place in the media.
Kind of like it has been done for other Soap Opera style articles. Thankyou. Raintheone (talk) 08:21, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- He's on a contract, and the article has sufficient out of universe information, so no. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 16:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Most of the links provided are about a past Asian family that left way before he came into it. Sounds like more point of view using them in this article. Besides I just don't think their should be different rules for different branches of articles, on the subject of soap opera's. Most characters have these links, yet Coronation Street, Hollyoaks and Emmerdale get merges. Raintheone (talk) 21:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Perhaps you should spend more time sourcing and rewriting Hollyoaks and Corrie articles, then their characters could also have their own pages.Gungadin 21:44, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- (edit conflict) Have you not seen the EastEnders minor lists? The fact is, this is a regular character, whose article has an out of universe section, whether it has information about the Ferreiras or not, it's relevant, and the character should have his own article. -Trampikey(talk)(contribs) 21:46, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thankyou, I'll do that on your advice. And get the sources for them. You are right, Tamwar should have his own page really, as every character on a contract should.Raintheone (talk) 21:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Sources
edit- 'EastEnders' star reveals Tamwar worries –anemoneprojectors– 00:17, 29 April 2011 (UTC)
- I personally didnt watch this but it may have been good, this link is for Afia to. Noreen celebrates EastEnders Afia & Tamwar's wedding MayhemMario (talk) 18:50, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
- Shame it's no longer available, if only we'd known within a week of the broadcast. And you don't watch radio programmes ;) –anemoneprojectors– 21:23, 30 April 2011 (UTC)
Jane Reynolds Reception — M.Mario (T/C) 18:51, 11 November 2012 (UTC)
More on Tamwar's spin-off: 'EastEnders': Himesh Patel on Tamwar Masood's spinoff and future –anemoneprojectors– 09:03, 17 July 2013 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 4 external links on Tamwar Masood. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.cre.gov.uk/Default.aspx.LocID-0hgnew06m.RefLocID-0hg00900c008.Lang-EN.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091010024717/http://media247.co.uk/bizasia/newsarchive/2009/10/eastenders_rude.php to http://media247.co.uk/bizasia/newsarchive/2009/10/eastenders_rude.php
- Added archive http://www.webcitation.org/5wg6sk3pN?url=http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/10/31/soapstar-superstars-septemberoctober/ to http://lowculture.co.uk/index.php/2009/10/31/soapstar-superstars-septemberoctober/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100503195057/http://watchwithmothers.net/2010/04/27/just-a-thought-eastenders-in-praise-of-tamwar/ to http://watchwithmothers.net/2010/04/27/just-a-thought-eastenders-in-praise-of-tamwar/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:59, 25 May 2017 (UTC)