Talk:Tanks of China
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Tanks of China article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
On 26 March 2013, it was proposed that this article be moved from Tanks in the People's Liberation Army to Tanks in the Chinese Army. The result of the discussion was page moved to Tanks in China. |
Requested move
edit- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the proposal was moved by Miniapolis. --BDD (talk) 16:07, 11 April 2013 (UTC) (non-admin closure)
Tanks in the People's Liberation Army → Tanks in the Chinese Army – A significant portion of the article has nothing to do with the PLA. This article covers tanks used by China during the warlord era, during KMT rule, and then during CPC rule. This article is an overview of tanks used by China, and is not specific to the PLA. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 15:00, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Probably not a bad idea based on the article's content except that the PLA is technically not the Chinese Army. — AjaxSmack 23:29, 26 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the PLA in theory only serves the party, not the country. Well, I guess an alternative might be Tanks in China or something. At any rate, the current title isn't really that great, as National Revolutionary Army history isn't related to the PLA. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 03:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- A note that similar articles were never uniform in article titling to begin with: On the one hand there's Tanks in the United States, Tanks in the Soviet Union; then, there is Tanks in the German Army, Tanks in the British Army, Tanks in the Japanese Army. We might want to also rename the other articles for uniformity purposes in the future as well, to reduce some of the mess. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 05:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Tanks in China is fine with me. — AjaxSmack 21:23, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
- A note that similar articles were never uniform in article titling to begin with: On the one hand there's Tanks in the United States, Tanks in the Soviet Union; then, there is Tanks in the German Army, Tanks in the British Army, Tanks in the Japanese Army. We might want to also rename the other articles for uniformity purposes in the future as well, to reduce some of the mess. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 05:37, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Yes, the PLA in theory only serves the party, not the country. Well, I guess an alternative might be Tanks in China or something. At any rate, the current title isn't really that great, as National Revolutionary Army history isn't related to the PLA. -- 李博杰 | —Talk contribs email 03:58, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
- Alternate use Tanks in China instead, since this article clearly isn't about the PLA only, as it covers material prior to its existence. IIRC, the PAP also has tanks. -- 65.92.180.137 (talk) 04:20, 27 March 2013 (UTC)
I support a move of some kind. Maybe Tanks in the Chinese military? --FutureTrillionaire (talk) 14:28, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support Tanks in China which is accurate and concise. --BDD (talk) 17:56, 2 April 2013 (UTC)
- Support. I think Tanks in China is the best suggestion so far (but even Tanks in the Chinese Army would be an improvement on the current title) bobrayner (talk) 11:37, 4 April 2013 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Blacklisted Links Found on the Main Page
editCyberbot II has detected that page contains external links that have either been globally or locally blacklisted. Links tend to be blacklisted because they have a history of being spammed, or are highly innappropriate for Wikipedia. This, however, doesn't necessarily mean it's spam, or not a good link. If the link is a good link, you may wish to request whitelisting by going to the request page for whitelisting. If you feel the link being caught by the blacklist is a false positive, or no longer needed on the blacklist, you may request the regex be removed or altered at the blacklist request page. If the link is blacklisted globally and you feel the above applies you may request to whitelist it using the before mentioned request page, or request its removal, or alteration, at the request page on meta. When requesting whitelisting, be sure to supply the link to be whitelisted and wrap the link in nowiki tags. The whitelisting process can take its time so once a request has been filled out, you may set the invisible parameter on the tag to true. Please be aware that the bot will replace removed tags, and will remove misplaced tags regularly.
Below is a list of links that were found on the main page:
- http://www.army-technology.com/projects/type99chinese-main/
- Triggered by
\barmy-technology\.com\b
on the local blacklist
- Triggered by
If you would like me to provide more information on the talk page, contact User:Cyberpower678 and ask him to program me with more info.
From your friendly hard working bot.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 11:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Resolved This issue has been resolved, and I have therefore removed the tag, if not already done. No further action is necessary.—cyberbot II NotifyOnline 22:09, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:22, 1 October 2018 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:
Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:36, 1 May 2019 (UTC)
A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
editThe following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion:
You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 16:22, 9 April 2020 (UTC)