This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page. |
This redirect does not require a rating on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Untitled
editOn the subject of imdb.com, I gather from the various Wikipedia discussions that there is no consensus policy regarding using it as a source. I take that to mean that information should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.
The pseudonym of "Tanohm O'Brien" is also attributd to Ms. Beyer on TV.com: http://www.tv.com/tanya-beyer/person/400764/summary.html# The site, as near as I can determine, is not considered questionable or unreliable by Wikipedia editors.
In the Imdb discussion, it is clear that a film itself can be directly cited. If Hullabaloo Wolfowitz or others would like to verify that it is a softcore film in which Tanohm O'Brien appears, please watch:
http://rapidshare.com/files/312365597/JJ_-_Fantasy_Women.part1.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/312419997/JJ_-_Fantasy_Women.part2.rar
http://rapidshare.com/files/312412258/JJ_-_Fantasy_Women.part3.rar
As it stands now, I've reinstated the graf regarding Fantasy Women so it conforms to the hard facts as stated by imdb.com. The original graf is more accurate, but I'll wait for a reply before reinstating it. -DKamiron (talk) 20:41, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Dkamiron
The information in the first draft of the Fantasy Women has been restored with slight revisions. The information is now referenced using the Internet Adult Film Database. The IAFD does not appear to be questionable or unreliable by other Wikipedia editors.
Also, I cannot find any reference to "softcore film" being an inappropriate film category. Apart from "pornographic film," there is no other category that would be appropriate in describing the film's content. And given that "pornographic film" is virtually synonymous with "hardcore pornographic film," I feel it is best to make the distinction. -DKamiron (talk) 22:45, 11 April 2010 (UTC)Dkamiron
redirect
editRedirecting as per discussion at the BLP/N. Do not revert without discussing there. If the thread is gone, open a new one. WP:BRD doods...--Cerejota (talk) 06:57, 27 August 2011 (UTC)