Talk:Tara (plantation)

Novels Low‑importance

	Novels portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.NovelsWikipedia:WikiProject NovelsTemplate:WikiProject Novelsnovel articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women writers Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women writers, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women writers on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women writersWikipedia:WikiProject Women writersTemplate:WikiProject Women writersWomen writers articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tara set at Selznick studios

Latest comment: 12 years ago4 comments4 people in discussion

It is indisputable fact that the Tara set was built at Selznick International Pictures, not M-G-M, and that the set was sold, dismantled, and sent to Georgia in 1959. I have provided excellent reference citations for this, from both 1959 and today. If you believe there is a story in the Los Angeles Times that claims the Tara set was at M-G-M and was demolished in the early 1980s, it is your obligation to provide a reference citation to that article. — Walloon 04:39, 24 September 2007 (UTC)Reply

Walloon is correct on this point -- the information there now is sufficiently sourced. If you would like to challenge that, you need to provide, not just point to, a reliable source which disputes it. - Che Nuevara 19:28, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

Che, are you the person who is mediating this dispute?24.45.196.36 22:23, 3 October 2007 (UTC)Reply

I hope that the latest information puts a rest to the controversy once and for all. It is no wonder there was much debate over this issue.SUNY Boy (talk) 04:20, 8 January 2012 (UTC)Reply

External links modified

Latest comment: 6 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tara (plantation). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:50, 8 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Add topic