Talk:Tarantul-class corvette

Reference comments

• Request that 194.85.148.66 be mindful in making "all Russkies are Commies" comments that such ill-informed negative assertions are unappreciated. In point of fact, during the Soviet era members of the Communist Party comprised less than 4% of the population and far from all of them were Russians. In the current situation the Communist Party of the Russian Federation (CFRF) is a relatively small organization with little to no functional influence on Russian policies of any kind.Moryak (talk) 12:54, 23 April 2010 (UTC)

He was trolling. 96.55.192.119 (talk) 21:04, 31 July 2010 (UTC)

US Navy

The operators list has the US Navy using this class of ship. Did the US receive a ship for evaluation or lease? Or is this false? I'm going to put a "citation needed" tag on it until someone can confirm or deny. I'm leaning towards just deleting the US from the list, though. I doubt the US has a Soviet/Russian ship in their position, though such occurrences are not unheard of. Ripberger (talk) 22:48, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

• Doh! Never mind. I just re-read the article about the German corvette Hiddensee. Even still, it's not technically a part of the US Navy. It's a museum ship. (And apparently, I need to get my eyes examined and actually read the whole article before going crazy with tags. Mea maxima culpa!) Ripberger (talk) 22:52, 5 January 2011 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Tarantul-class corvette. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20101124115305/http://hnsa.org/ships/hiddensee.htm to http://www.hnsa.org/ships/hiddensee.htm
• Added {{dead link}} tag to http://balabin-1712.livejournal.com/3395.html
• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071118105013/http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Veer.html to http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/NAVY/Veer.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:02, 5 April 2017 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

• Nirghat.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 02:06, 1 November 2018 (UTC)

questionable claim

"The need for these improvements was underscored by the First Gulf War, when 12 Iraqi Osa-I-class missile boats were destroyed or damaged by short ranged Sea Skua anti-ship missiles. They were attacked by British Lynx helicopters, but the Osa crews did not notice them because they flew below their radar horizon."

The Sea Skua uses a guidance principle that makes this impossible. The helicopter needed to have a radio sline of sight to the ship to engage it with the Sea Skua missile. I propose we delete that part, it has no source anyway. 193.25.47.211 (talk) 12:55, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Sure. Sounds reasonable. Llammakey (talk) 12:56, 1 February 2024 (UTC)

Vandalism

This page was vandalised today, we might want to consider protecting it. Aitorbk (talk) 17:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)