Talk:Tartar Relation

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Mongols Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mongols, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mongol culture, history, language, and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MongolsWikipedia:WikiProject MongolsTemplate:WikiProject MongolsMongols articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Name?

Latest comment: 2 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

Is there a reason why this is known as he "Tartar Relation", rather than the more obvious translation "History of the Tartars"? 92.31.31.184 (talk) 08:31, 29 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

It's in the 'Manuscripts' section, last sentence: The title Tartar Relation, coined by Painter for his 1965 edition, has stuck, cited to Connell 2000. The edition in question is cited under 'Editions'. Although not a good translation, it isn't a bad title, considering that it is an "ethnographic report" and not simply a history. Srnec (talk) 01:59, 30 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Add topic