Talk:Tartessian language
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Index
|
|||
This page has archives. Sections older than 50 days may be automatically archived by Lowercase sigmabot III when more than 4 sections are present. |
Texts or transcriptions?
editWhy in the text section of the article are we given phonetic transcriptions, rather than simple texts? The Grecian style letters do not provide superscripts. We should have actual plain transcriptions, which are uncontestable as texts, rather than interpretations as if they were primary. μηδείς (talk) 03:51, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
- How can we have? Is there a unicode for Tartessian? Paul S (talk) 09:03, 31 March 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tartessian language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.oxbowbooks.com/bookinfo.cfm/ID/88298/OnlyResult/Yes - Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110723195518/http://www.oxbowbooks.com/bookinfo.cfm/ID/91450//Location/Oxbow to http://www.oxbowbooks.com/bookinfo.cfm/ID/91450//Location/Oxbow
- Added
{{dead link}}
tag to http://www.ucm.es/BUCM/revistas/ghi/11316993/articulos/CMPL0101110097A.PDF
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:45, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Tartessian language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100531192725/http://escritadosudoeste.no.sapo.pt/arquivo/studifenici.pdf to http://escritadosudoeste.no.sapo.pt/arquivo/studifenici.pdf
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:47, 6 January 2018 (UTC)
Indoeuropean discarded
editIt seems most recent studies have discarded an indoeuropean origin. Article should be updated.Guzzpacho (talk) 10:30, 15 May 2023 (UTC)