Talk:Tasmanian temperate rainforests

Merge Proposal

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section. A summary of the conclusions reached follows.

The proposal was supported and the article has been merged. Operator873^CONNECT 20:57, 4 October 2017 (UTC)

---

• support - the articles both have a range of issues, and a good merge will take some effort from a good reader/editor with adequate knowledges of the subject matter. User:JarrahTree 14:50, 12 May 2015 (UTC)
• Support Tdslk (talk) 20:21, 16 May 2015 (UTC)
• Support. Maias (talk) 23:59, 25 August 2015 (UTC)
• Support Purrsh^talk 19:04, 29 May 2016 (UTC)
• Support. BlackcurrantTea (talk) 23:15, 28 June 2016 (UTC)

Merge

Ok, this is a mess. This is Tasmanian temperate rain forests as of 10/23/2013. That seems to be the last edit before the mess. Then @Jordz1412: came along and did . . . stuff. Between March 13, 2015 and March 17, 2015 he added a lot of sourced information, albeit somewhat disorganized see diff. Then, on March 20, 2015 he blanked the page, and was reverted by Cluebot. Then he did this which was reverted as vandalism. Then he did this with the edit summary of "took out my own work and created my own page instead". Cluebot reverted. Around that same time he created Tasmanian cool temperate rainforests, which was essentially a copy-paste of the stuff he was taking out of this article, which he had previously added to this article. There were several more edits consisting of him removing information in smaller chunks (presumably to avoid triggering Cluebot). Then @Pollyhannaford: came along and did some stuff. That person also created Tasmanian ferns, which talks extensively about "Tasmania's Cool Temperate Forests". Then @Krasanen: reverted all of Pollyhannaford's edits and all of Jordz' removal of info back to the last Cluebot version. Meanwhile, Jordz continued working on Tasmanian cool temperate rainforests.

At this point, much of the info in the two pages is essentially identical; but not all of it. I'm not clear as to why Jordz decided to create a separate page rather than continuing to work on this one. I don't want to be bold and do the merge myself without some idea why Jordz decided to create the separate page to begin with. Also, if these pages are merged I'd like to see a history merge performed, which requires the help of an admin. So; is there a reason for these to be separate? If not, they should be merged. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 15:00, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

Thank you for the background on this matter, it helps support the proposal for a merge, and careful monitoring of identifiable issues. User:JarrahTree 15:09, 12 May 2015 (UTC)

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

File nominated for deletion on commons

file=c:File:Atherosperma moschatum.jpg|patten=No permission indicated subpage= 

Message automatically deposited by a robot on 07:28, 2 January 2018 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harideepan (talk • contribs)

File nominated for deletion on commons

file=c:File:EUCRYPHIACEAE Eucryphia lucida.gif|patten=No permission indicated subpage= 

Message automatically deposited by a robot on 07:44, 2 January 2018 (UTC). — Preceding unsigned comment added by Harideepan (talk • contribs)