This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Songs, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of songs on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SongsWikipedia:WikiProject SongsTemplate:WikiProject Songssong articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women in Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women in music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women in MusicWikipedia:WikiProject Women in MusicTemplate:WikiProject Women in MusicWomen in music articles
Overall: Article has no major issues and the hooks are sourced in the article text. Earwig did turn up a 35.1%, but everything that got flagged appears to be quotes or minor phrases. My only real concern is that the lack of a reception section in the article might leave a bit to be desired for some, but I'm pretty sure that's out of the scope for this, especially since the album just released. Both hooks are good, though I personally prefer ALT1. I'll leave it up to whoever puts the article in queue. Good job. λNegativeMP119:31, 23 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I have added a brief reception section for now but I imagine it will get bigger by the time the hook runs.--NØ23:16, 24 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
The Carpenter article is generating 50-100,000 daily pageviews recently so I would assume the public interest to be there for ALT0. She is having monumental success right now. I prefer that to ALT1 anyways.--NØ19:01, 14 September 2024 (UTC)Reply