Talk:Taxation districts of the Achaemenid Empire

Paricanians

Paricanians are mentioned twice ni the table, in districts X and XVII. --Z 11:00, 9 May 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Districts of the Achaemenid Empire. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20070416070140/http://www.livius.org/da-dd/darius/darius_i_t08.html to http://www.livius.org/da-dd/darius/darius_i_t08.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:18, 11 September 2017 (UTC)

Palestine in the Taxation District number V.

Herodotus mentions "The part of Syria called Palestine" as part of the V district, alongside Phoenicia.

He never mentions "Yehud Medinata", nor "Judea", nor "Israel". Nor as part of any tax district nor he mentions any of these names in any other part of his 9 History books...

I'm afraid that a religious fanatic corrupted this article 2A02:A445:8798:1:ED0F:A65:EA42:CCBB (talk) 12:17, 22 December 2021 (UTC)

The exchange rate given by Herodotus does not correspond to silver weight

I noticed that the exchange rate given by Herodotus (1 Babylonian talent of silver = 1.3 Euboïc talents of silver) does not match the silver weight (if we accept the introductory statement that 1 Babylonian talent = 30.3 kg of silver while 1 Euboïc talent = 26 kg of silver, the exchange rate should be 1 : 1.17). Does anyone have any idea how to solve this apparent contradiction? Anaxicrates (talk) 04:18, 24 February 2022 (UTC)