Talk:Taxonomy of Narcissus/GA1

Latest comment: 9 years ago by Mgoodyear in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Fredlyfish4 (talk · contribs) 00:57, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

  1. Is it reasonably well written?
    A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:  
    B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:  
  2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
    A. Has an appropriate reference section:  
    B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:  
    C. No original research:  
  3. Is it broad in its coverage?
    A. Major aspects:  
    B. Focused:  
  4. Is it neutral?
    Fair representation without bias:  
  5. Is it stable?
    No edit wars, etc:  
  6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
    A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:  
    B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:  
  7. Overall:
    Pass or Fail:  

Comments

edit
  • Avoid saying things like "in the current century" as in the lead. Use specific dates, range of years, century, etc.

  Done date inserted --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:13, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • What exactly does "escape" refer to in the lead?

  Done the same as in the text, escape from cultivation and subsequent naturalisation, a technical term in the evolution of speciation. Clarified. --Michael Goodyear (talk) 13:18, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

  • Who accepted 160 species? All these other figures talked about with their authors, but not this one.

  Done Adrian Haworth. Attributed now --Michael Goodyear (talk) 15:07, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply


This looks good overall. Fredlyfish4 (talk) 02:22, 2 January 2015 (UTC)Reply