Talk:Te'omim Cave
Latest comment: 1 year ago by Vaticidalprophet in topic Did you know nomination
 | A fact from Te'omim Cave appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 September 2023 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|  |
Did you know nomination
edit- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Vaticidalprophet talk 21:26, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
( )
Te'omim Cave
- ... that the Te'omim Cave (pictured), a karstic cave in Israel, holds significance both as a natural habitat for bats and as a refuge cave used by Jewish rebels during the Bar Kokhba revolt? Source: Zissu, B., Eshel, H., Langford, B., and Frumkin, A., "Coins from the Bar Kokhba Revolt, hidden in Mearat Ha-Teomim (Mughâret Umm et Tûeimîn), Western Jerusalem Hills." Israel Numismatic Journal, Vol. 17, 2010, pp. 113–147
- ALT1: ... that the Te'omim Cave (pictured) in Israel was home to a Bronze Age alabaster quarry, a refuge cave during the Jewish–Roman wars, and a possible center for necromantic activity in late antiquity? Source: Klein, E., & Zissu, B. (2023). Oil Lamps, Spearheads and Skulls: Possible Evidence of Necromancy during Late Antiquity in the Te’omim Cave, Judean Hills. Harvard Theological Review, 116(3), pp. 399-421.
- Reviewed:
Created by Koroneiki (talk). Self-nominated at 08:01, 15 September 2023 (UTC). Post-promotion hook changes for this nom will be logged at Template talk:Did you know nominations/Te'omim Cave; consider watching this nomination, if it is successful, until the hook appears on the Main Page.
Article is new enough and long enough. Going to AGF with a number of sources. One paragraph in the description section is unsourced, and I would probably qualify the word "cult" a bit in the text. Of the few sources I have access to, most seem to support the content. The "drop a few random sentences into Google" technique uncovered no evidence of plagiarism or copyvio, neither the few sources I could access. No preference for either hook. No QPQ needed. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 16:18, 15 September 2023 (UTC)
- Hello Jo-Jo Emuerus, I wanted to let you know that I've addressed the two issues you mentioned. I've replaced the term 'cult' with more accessible explanations and removed sentences lacking sources. Additionally, I've expanded the content, so it might be a good idea to run again those tests you mentioned. Thanks for your help! Koroneiki (talk) 08:42, 16 September 2023 (UTC)
