This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany articles
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bavaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bavaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BavariaWikipedia:WikiProject BavariaTemplate:WikiProject BavariaBavaria articles
The picture shown here on top right is NOT the Mooslanerkopf but the view point next to Görings house on the Eckerbichl; Rev: ; Rev: File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-F051620-0043, Hitler, Göring und v. Schirach auf Obersalzberg.jpg
Latest comment: 4 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This picture is not referenced in the article text. The pictured rock does not appear to be part of the historic structure. The inscribed rune, in fact, looks like it may have been a 'fresh' carving at the time the photo was taken. This means it is possibly a case of post-war Nazi's 'tagging' the site. If so, publishing the picture amounts to Wikipedia broadcasting a neo-Nazi tag. Unless there is evidence that the inscription dates to the Nazi era, I think the picture should be removed from Wikipedia. --Regionrat1234 (talk) 03:34, 12 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
.svg){kind=small}
