 | This article was nominated for deletion on 9 December 2012 (UTC). The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
| This article was nominated for deletion on 30 September 2010 (UTC). The result of the discussion was keep. |
 | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||
 | The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this article. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.
|
}}
Keep rationale
editIt is my contention that this work meets the criteria for musicians and ensembles based on criteria 1 and 7:
- #1: The work has been covered in a variety of media and as been the subject of multiple non-trivial published works whose source is independent from the musician or ensemble itself and reliable.
- #7: Is a prominent representation of a notable style (geek rock). More importantly it is one of the first geek “girl group” productions to see wide release, making it a seminal work of an emerging style. —Preceding unsigned comment added by NorthernDragon (talk • contribs) 13:30, 30 September 2010 (UTC)
New video by them
editIt's probably not particularly notable - which is why I didn't edit it into the article - but they made a new video: A Very Zombie Holiday. --V2Blast (talk) 17:38, 2 January 2011 (UTC)
External links modified
editHello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Team Unicorn. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100930031059/http://www.fox5sandiego.com:80/videobeta/95c0a11e-e1b9-4f3b-a2cf-c2b5eb23bf94/Community/Meet-the-Geek-Girls? to http://www.fox5sandiego.com/videobeta/95c0a11e-e1b9-4f3b-a2cf-c2b5eb23bf94/Community/Meet-the-Geek-Girls
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110301100928/http://www.smodcast.com:80/baggedandboarded/bb/bb83.html to http://smodcast.com/baggedandboarded/bb/bb83.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:14, 31 January 2016 (UTC)
Infobox image
edit.jpg)
The image to the right was added to the infobox on July 26, 2015, then removed on August 5, 2015 with the comment: Since Michele Boyd has not been a part of the group for several years, this does not accurately portray the group. I think it should be put in the infobox, since:
- it does portray the group at founding, which is not any less important than at current
- they got their notability with their starting line-up, not with the current one.
Less importantly:
- it does portray 3 of the 4 current members; and
- we don't have any freely licensed image of the group at current (I looked, which is why there is another image of the group later in the article - again at founding, not at current lineup).
I gather User:108.185.108.164 disagrees. Let's talk, and see if we can come to agreement, or whether anyone else has any other opinions. --GRuban (talk) 18:17, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- Since there isn't a current picture, it's better than nothing, and the caption already indicates it's an old lineup. It can be updated to a picture of the new lineup should such a picture come up in Commons. AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:53, 7 April 2016 (UTC)
- User:108.185.108.164 tried to post another picture of the group using this one but it looks to be a duplicate of the one at comingsoon.net [1]. It's also the one they have been using as their icon on Twitter. [2] AngusWOOF (bark • sniff) 18:29, 27 April 2016 (UTC)
