Talk:Ted Stevens/GA1

Latest comment: 2 years ago by Mycranthebigman in topic GA Review

GA Review

edit
GA toolbox
Reviewing

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Steelkamp (talk · contribs) 13:38, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Hello, I will be reviewing this article. It is the longest article I've reviewed so bear with me. Steelkamp (talk) 13:38, 12 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

@Mycranthebigman: Would you like it if I pause this review whilst you make some additions? You seem to be in the process of adding quite a bit of information. Steelkamp (talk) 05:04, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm terribly sorry, but if you could pause and resume on the 15th, that'd be great. Extremely sorry about the disruption so early on, wishing you well, thank you ^_^ Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 05:18, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
Ok. Steelkamp (talk) 05:25, 13 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
I'm going to start the review now. Steelkamp (talk) 04:32, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Good article criteria

edit

  Well written

edit
  • Without good reason, you shouldn't have more than four paragraphs in the lead. Steelkamp (talk) 05:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • He was previously Solicitor of the Department of the Interior from September 1960 to January 1961. This doesn't need to be its own paragraph. Steelkamp (talk) 05:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • The special counsel report shouldn't be an external link within the actual article text. Use referencing. Steelkamp (talk) 05:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply
  • Ampersands should not be used in prose unless they are part of a proper noun. I've fixed this myself, hopefully I didn't do this to any proper nouns. Steelkamp (talk) 05:06, 28 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Verifiable with no original research

edit

  Broad in its coverage

edit

  Neutral

edit

  Stable

edit

  Illustrated, if possible

edit

General

edit

A month later and there are still many paragraphs without any citations and the prose issues are still there. The article is not at the GA standard right now and it seems it will take a while for it to get there, so I am going to fail this review. Feel free to renominate the article when it has been improved. Steelkamp (talk) 08:26, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Alright. Thank you for your time! I will renominate this article in the future once I finish my work on it. God bless! Mycranthebigman of Alaska ^_^ 15:03, 28 September 2022 (UTC)Reply