Talk:Teflon Don (album)
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Teflon Don (album) article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||
|
Speedy?
editNeeds WP:SALT on this deletion, see deletion log. — TRANSPORTERMAN (TALK) 15:30, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
- I disagree. The issue at the last AfD was whether there were independent reliable sources to support the album. There are such sources in the current version, unless you can refute or discredit them somehow. —C.Fred (talk) 17:29, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
AfD logs
editThis article has been through AfD twice:
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teflon Don (album), nominated 25 July 2009, closed as delete.
- Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Teflon Don (album) (2nd nomination), nominated 3 January 2010, closed as speedy delete (G4).
I am the administrator who closed the second nomination.
When I closed that nomination, I based it on the concern raised in the original nomination: "Deprodded without reason. No confirmed tracks, singles, release date or sufficient background. Fails WP:NALBUMS." Looking at the current version of the article, those concerns have been addressed: sources have been added to confirm tracks on the album, and it has begun receiving significant coverage. I know one of the sources is from MTV.com.
Accordingly, I do not feel that criterion G4 is met to allow speedy deletion of the article. If editors feel that deletion is warranted, a new (third) AfD nomination will be required. —C.Fred (talk) 17:38, 28 May 2010 (UTC)
Track listing
editIt looks like a full track listing went up today. What's the source of it? —C.Fred (talk) 22:58, 8 June 2010 (UTC)
- Its most likly fake. Should not be there unless a source is provided. STAT -Verse 00:16, 9 June 2010 (UTC)
Blow(in')? Money Fast
editThe islanddefjam.com link cited early in the article shows a subtitle for track 9 of "Blow Money Fast". iTunes lists it as "Blowin' Money Fast". Which of these two contradictory titles should we use? —C.Fred (talk) 18:05, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- iTunes should be used because that is most likly how the song will be named on the CD. STAT -Verse 18:12, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
- Good point. I've left the islanddefjam story cited, since it supports the release as a single, with the iTunes ref to support it for the change in title. —C.Fred (talk) 18:18, 3 July 2010 (UTC)
Edit request from Voidrunner, 13 July 2010
editFor the bonus song "Audio Meth" the producer should be listed as "The Runners" and the featured artist as "Raekwon"
SOURCES: The Runners' trademark drop sound is at the beginning of the song in snippets posted online, and Raekwon's voice is clearly heard rapping later in the snippet. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Voidrunner (talk • contribs) 18:15, 14 July 2010 (UTC)
Voidrunner (talk) 22:29, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. —C.Fred (talk) 22:53, 13 July 2010 (UTC)
Edit request from 22 July 2010
editEdit request of misspelled name "Juliene Kung – Viola" should be "Julienne Kung - Viola" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 143.215.104.94 (talk) 18:57, 22 July 2010 (UTC)