Talk:Temple Mountain (New Hampshire)
Latest comment: 16 years ago by Pgagnon999 in topic Merge
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
It is requested that an image or photograph of Temple Mountain (New Hampshire) be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible. Wikipedians in New Hampshire may be able to help! The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites. |
Merge
editTemple Mountain Ski Area has been defunct for several years; merge into article about mountain?--Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:52, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support merge. The ski area article is short enough to make a nice section in the mountain article, especially now that the ski area has been made a conservation property.--Ken Gallager (talk) 13:33, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Support - speaking as the guy who created the ski area article, it would be fine as part of this article. - DavidWBrooks (talk) 15:09, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Undecided - I may be able to build this out, as I might start a NELSAP entry for the ski area with some history and photos. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jrclark (talk • contribs) 16:25, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Question Jrclark, when do you forsee yourself engaging this expansion (in terms of days, months, or years)? How big (in terms of text) would the expansion be? --Pgagnon999 (talk) 20:54, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Fair question, not this week...might as well merge and I can contribute over there later. Perhaps if it seems bloated, we can split it out again. Jrclark (talk) 23:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks, now merging. . .the old article space will remain as a redirect, so it can be reconstituted into an article in the future if needed.--Pgagnon999 (talk) 23:28, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
- Fair question, not this week...might as well merge and I can contribute over there later. Perhaps if it seems bloated, we can split it out again. Jrclark (talk) 23:19, 20 February 2008 (UTC)